Benchmarking the Impact of the Patient Movement
Above is an animated presentation about PatientView’s latest report (optimised for Internet Explorer only). Please click on the ‘Forward’ arrow. The Prezi may take 30 seconds to load, so please be patient. Once loaded, to view in fullscreen, click on ‘More’, and then on ‘Fullscreen’.
Click here for press release (with listings of all indicators and variables): http://bit.ly/NzxQoT
Click here for purchasing details http://bit.ly/Mk0dbJ
From: PatientView, UK, July 2012
PatientView announces the launch of a new tool that allows patient groups from around the world to be BENCHMARKED for their impact upon national healthcare systems
Three key barometers were used to build this new benchmarking too—the opinions of …
· 1,000 patient groups from around the world.
· 20 senior healthcare professionals from Europe. And
· 30 senior healthcare industry executives from around the world.
The reason for creating this new benchmarking tool
Patient groups and other health NGOs are expanding rapidly, and have never been so popular as they are today. Their growth is fuelled by the damage inflicted upon mainstream national healthcare systems from tough new doses of fiscal austerity, and by ever-increasing patient demand for services. Patients frustrated at declining levels of healthcare provision are readily turning to the charity sector for help and advice. Patient groups are also prospering from the advent of social media, which enables them to reach out to thousands (and, sometimes, even to millions) of patients at a fraction of the cost of traditional methods of communication. Yet, despite the obvious importance of the patient movement, no real mechanism exists to measure the movement’s impact upon national healthcare systems—hence the development of this new benchmarking tool.
Described in ‘Benchmarking the Patient Movement—Part 1, PatientView Quarterly, July 2012
· The impact of the patient movement from the perspective of 20 healthcare professionals and 30 health industry executives.
· This new tool for benchmarking the patient movement.
· The eight Indicators that comprise the new benchmarking tool.
· How patient groups from 10 countries/regions of the world perform when assessed by each of the benchmarking tool’s eight Indicators.
The country/regional analyses make surprising and enlightening reading. Find out …
What healthcare professionals think about the impact of the patient movement.
What your peer companies are saying about the impact of the patient movement.
Why patient groups in Australasia, Canada, the UK, and the USA turn out to be the world’s best at running complex businesses.
How patient groups in Central and South America are almost as adept at exploiting social media as the world’s best—patient groups in the United States.
The wide-ranging services provided by patient groups from Australasia, Central and South America, and Spain.
Why Eastern European patient groups are the world’s best at networking with other healthcare stakeholders.
Why German patient groups are the world’s best at networking with their peer patient groups (but rank bottom for networking with other healthcare stakeholders).
Why Spanish patient groups have the best reputation in the world (while Canadian patient groups rank bottom for reputation).
Why patient groups from Central and South American can be considered the world’s most effective overall (followed by patient groups in Australasia, and then by those in the UK).
How this benchmarking study of patient groups was undertaken
PatientView conducted three surveys in May 2012, asking 1,000 patient groups from around the world, 20 senior healthcare professionals and 30 health industry executives to measure the impact of patient groups on health policy and healthcare systems.
The eight Indicators used to assess patient group impact upon healthcare systems
1. Business acumen
2. Communication (via social media)
3. Range of services provided
4. Scale of networking with stakeholders
5. Scale of networking with peer organisations
7. Impact on national health policy, and
8. Perceived hurdles
Each of the eight Indicators is defined by various factors. For example, business acumen comprises having: a mission/vision statement; a formal structure of governance; regular consultation with patients; a sustainable form of financing; an operating/business plan; and independence from funders.
Patient groups in the following 10 countries/regions were assessed for their effectiveness by the new benchmarking tool:
· Central and South America
· Eastern Europe
Contents of this July 2012 issue of PatientView Quarterly
Introduction from the editor;
Introducing the benchmarking tool’s eight Indicators;
Rankings of patient groups in the 10 countries/regions;
The impact of the patient movement, quantified in the ten countries/regions;
52 pages, PDF only
For more information about this July 2012 issue of PatientView Quarterly, or for more information on obtaining a license to use PatientView’s new benchmarking tool, contact … Alex Wyke, CEO, PatientView firstname.lastname@example.org